IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijimad/v21y2024i1-2p149-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Greenwashing and brand perception - a consumer sentiment analysis on organisations accused of greenwashing

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine Baxter
  • Rajab Ghandour
  • Wendy Histon

Abstract

This study analyses public sentiment from data mining twitter posts, both before and after greenwashing accusations were proven against eight established, well-known brands. The purpose of the exploration is to discover the extent to which greenwashing practice has a detrimental effect upon the consumer brand relationship. This effect is measured through customer comments via sentiment analysis. Applying data scraping techniques, data mining and sentiment analysis the authors measured the differences in consumer sentiment and positioning towards brands before and after the greenwashing scandals. Findings revealed that most brands showed a reduction in the number of Tweets directly after the greenwashing ruling. We apply brand transgression theory to explain our findings, which could be interpreted as consumer avoidance, in short, less engagement with the brand is evident, demonstrating consumer disapproval. Negative sentiment increased in the Tweets analysed, post greenwashing ruling for all brands, however, surprisingly, consumer trust with the brands was not altered and actually increased in the majority of cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine Baxter & Rajab Ghandour & Wendy Histon, 2024. "Greenwashing and brand perception - a consumer sentiment analysis on organisations accused of greenwashing," International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(1/2), pages 149-179.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijimad:v:21:y:2024:i:1/2:p:149-179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=140452
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijimad:v:21:y:2024:i:1/2:p:149-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=84 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.