IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijimad/v15y2021i4p429-449.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effectiveness of e-word-of-mouth communication about smartphones purchase intention: digital influencer

Author

Listed:
  • João Ferreira Do Rosário
  • Sandra Maria Correia Loureiro

Abstract

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of eWOM on Facebook, Instagram and YouTube for smartphone buying decision, provided by digital influencers. For such, a quantitative methodology was adopted using three online questionnaires (one for each social media platform), to be answered by Portuguese adults who use them. This comparison has foundation on the IACM, a model introduced by Erkan and Evans to explore the influence of eWOM on consumer's buying intentions. The results show that, while the eWOM information from digital influencers about smartphones has a global consumer receptivity in the three social media platforms considered, that is not happening in a very assertive way for some items [average not greater than 3 (Likert scale 1-5)], in a significant statistically way. The research also demonstrate that YouTube or Instagram are more effective than Facebook in the IACM variables 'information quality', 'information credibility', 'information usefulness', 'positive buying intention with digital influencer positive information' and 'negative buying intention with digital influencer negative information'.

Suggested Citation

  • João Ferreira Do Rosário & Sandra Maria Correia Loureiro, 2021. "The effectiveness of e-word-of-mouth communication about smartphones purchase intention: digital influencer," International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(4), pages 429-449.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijimad:v:15:y:2021:i:4:p:429-449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=117567
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijimad:v:15:y:2021:i:4:p:429-449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=84 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.