IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijient/v5y2018i1-2p141-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coordination quality index: a metric for measuring the quality of coordination efforts in humanitarian supply chain

Author

Listed:
  • Lijo John
  • Anand Gurumurthy
  • Gunjan Soni

Abstract

The effectiveness of the coordination practice has a direct consequence on the performance of humanitarian supply chain operations and it becomes imperative for the managers to quantify the effectiveness of the coordination activities. This study aims to provide humanitarian agencies with a tool to measure effectiveness of its coordination strategies. Coordination quality index (CQI) is introduced as an aggregate measure of the degree of implementation of various coordination practices carried out. Furthermore, the application of the proposed methodology is demonstrated in the setting of Chennai flood relief activities. The results indicate that the overall quality score obtained for coordination during the Chennai floods was moderate to low. The major reason for the poor coordination was due to poor information sharing, large diversity of actors and lack of streamlined organisational mandates. It also found that, though there were efforts to improve coordination, the expected benefits of these activities were not achieved.

Suggested Citation

  • Lijo John & Anand Gurumurthy & Gunjan Soni, 2018. "Coordination quality index: a metric for measuring the quality of coordination efforts in humanitarian supply chain," International Journal of Intelligent Enterprise, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1/2), pages 141-172.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijient:v:5:y:2018:i:1/2:p:141-172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=91187
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijient:v:5:y:2018:i:1/2:p:141-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=167 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.