IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijidsc/v8y2016i1p73-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A case study on partitioning data for classification

Author

Listed:
  • Bikash Kanti Sarkar

Abstract

Designing accurate model for classification problem is a real concern in context of machine learning. The various factors such as inclusion of excellent samples in the training set, the number of samples as well as the proportion of each class type in the set (that would be sufficient for designing model) play important roles in this purpose. In this article, an investigation is introduced to address the question of what proportion of the samples should be devoted to the training set for developing a better classification model. The experimental results on several datasets, using C4.5 classifier, shows that any equidistributed data partitioning in between (20%, 80%) and (30%, 70%) may be considered as the best sample partition to build classification model irrespective to domain, size and class imbalanced.

Suggested Citation

  • Bikash Kanti Sarkar, 2016. "A case study on partitioning data for classification," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 73-91.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:73-91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=75788
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Costa, Ana & Guerreiro, João & Moro, Sérgio & Henriques, Roberto, 2019. "Unfolding the characteristics of incentivized online reviews," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 272-281.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:73-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=306 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.