IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijicbm/v4y2011i6p658-684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A survey of positive and negative aspects of the Indian administrative bureaucratic system

Author

Listed:
  • Prem Lal Joshi
  • Rajesh Kumar

Abstract

This online survey, based on a sample size of 340 responses, was carried out to ascertain public perceptions of the positive and negative aspects of the Indian administrative bureaucratic system (IAS). Only 13% of the respondents were satisfied with the system. The most important positive aspect with respect to the IAS system was the factor of decent living and working conditions, and the most important negative aspect was the tendency to serve their political masters rather than the general public. The most important positive aspect of the lower level bureaucracy was the greater dependence on the junior bureaucrats by their seniors, and the most critical negative aspect was that lower level bureaucrats have no sense of wastage of public money. The more the experience that respondents had with the system, the more negative their perceptions of the system became. The Indian residents held much stronger negative views about the IAS system than their non-resident Indian (NRI) counterparts.

Suggested Citation

  • Prem Lal Joshi & Rajesh Kumar, 2011. "A survey of positive and negative aspects of the Indian administrative bureaucratic system," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(6), pages 658-684.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:4:y:2011:i:6:p:658-684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=42913
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:4:y:2011:i:6:p:658-684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=235 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.