IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijicbm/v23y2021i1p95-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning agility, culture and outcome: an empirical study

Author

Listed:
  • Susmita Ghosh
  • Ashutosh Muduli

Abstract

Recently, agility research has reported the influence of culture on agility effectiveness. Research on culture has been attracting attention by management scholars owing to its capability to affect organisational effectiveness. While most of the culture and management research are on training, compensation, performance appraisal, very few research has been conducted in the context of learning agility. The research aims to explore the relationship between learning agility and outcome. Further the study investigates the mediating role of culture between learning agility and outcome. Research hypotheses are developed from the related literatures and tested through the data collected from various manufacturing firms in India. Data is analysed via SPSS and AMOS. The result suggests that learning agility influences the outcome through a supportive culture. The discussions, findings of the results and implications from managerial prospects are provided in the last part of the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Susmita Ghosh & Ashutosh Muduli, 2021. "Learning agility, culture and outcome: an empirical study," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(1), pages 95-110.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:23:y:2021:i:1:p:95-110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=115413
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nagamani Subramanian & M. Suresh, 2022. "Assessment Framework for Agile HRM Practices," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(1), pages 135-149, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:23:y:2021:i:1:p:95-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=235 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.