IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijicbm/v18y2019i1p59-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the causal relationship between justice and citizenship behaviours: an Indian perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Pooja Garg
  • Renu Rastogi
  • Parul Malik

Abstract

This study empirically investigates the nexus between organisational justice and organisational citizenship behaviour among employees working in Indian automobile industries. The present study results affirm that citizenship behaviour is determined by the perceptions, which employees hold about justice in their organisation. The study data were collected from 200 employees working in automobile industries in India using convenience sampling method. The collected data were subjected to exploratory factor analysis and further confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was utilised to confirm the factorial structure of the study constructs. Finally, structural equation modelling (SEM) was conducted to test the study hypotheses. The study results revealed a positive influence of perceived organisational justice factors on citizenship behaviours. In addition, the analysis of the data indicated the emergence of another dimension of justice perception, which was labelled as informational justice. The findings asserted that employees justice perceptions significantly augment their citizenship behaviours and lubricate the social fabric of the organisation leading to effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Pooja Garg & Renu Rastogi & Parul Malik, 2019. "Modelling the causal relationship between justice and citizenship behaviours: an Indian perspective," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(1), pages 59-84.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:18:y:2019:i:1:p:59-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=96923
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:18:y:2019:i:1:p:59-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=235 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.