IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijhrdm/v6y2006i1p92-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives on Human Resource Management: an explorative study of the consequences of projectification in four firms

Author

Listed:
  • Karin Bredin
  • Jonas Soderlund

Abstract

Various forms of project-based organisational structures are on the rise. A number of recent empirical studies have emphasised the important role of Human Resource Management (HRM) in the understanding of the modern projectified firm. However, previous research has not analysed in any greater detail what implications projectification have for HRM. In our attempt to contribute to the intersection between project-based firms and human resource management, this paper zeros in on the challenges facing HRM in four large Swedish firms. We address the following questions: How has HRM changed due to the increasing projectification observed in the firms under study? What are the major challenges to the HRM practice observed in the case studies? We suggest a four-perspective model for the analysis of the identified changes of, and challenges for, current HRM practice. The perspectives include competence, trust, change and individuals. Based on these perspectives, we identify some key questions for HRM and suggest an analytical framework for the analysis of the change of HRM and the new roles of HRM given the increased projectification observed in the case-study companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Karin Bredin & Jonas Soderlund, 2006. "Perspectives on Human Resource Management: an explorative study of the consequences of projectification in four firms," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 92-113.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:6:y:2006:i:1:p:92-113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=9751
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamed Ali Hedhili & Sami Boudabbous, 2020. "Recruitment and Evaluation Practices at the Service of Project-Based Organization and Competence Management: Case of Tunisian Companies," Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 7(1), pages 17-24.
    2. Rajeev Sharma & Soumendra Narain Bagchi, 2024. "Projectized Community of Practice: A Case Study of Globally Distributed Information Technology Organization," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 49(1), pages 7-24, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:6:y:2006:i:1:p:92-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=15 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.