IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijgenv/v15y2016i4p300-314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Five criteria for global sustainable development

Author

Listed:
  • Kristin Linnerud
  • Erling Holden

Abstract

A clear understanding of the global-level sustainable development concept is necessary before applying it to projects at a national, local or firm level. Such lower-level projects may concern managing production and consumption of energy, organisation of cities and using land productively. However, the sustainable development goals adopted at the United Nations Summit in September 2015 do not provide adequate guidance, even at the global level, because the goals are too many, too vague and often not quantified. Based on the 1987 report Our Common Future, we derive five criteria for the development of primary goals and corresponding indictors and quantified thresholds to be met.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristin Linnerud & Erling Holden, 2016. "Five criteria for global sustainable development," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(4), pages 300-314.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijgenv:v:15:y:2016:i:4:p:300-314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=81044
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristin Linnerud & Erling Holden & Morten Simonsen, 2021. "Closing the sustainable development gap: A global study of goal interactions," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 738-753, July.
    2. Charmaine Williamson & Peet Venter, 2018. "Paradox as a generative practice," Eastern European Business and Economics Journal, Eastern European Business and Economics Studies Centre, vol. 4(2), pages 162-188.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijgenv:v:15:y:2016:i:4:p:300-314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=14 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.