IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijgeni/v40y2017i5p335-343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk minimisation: the failure of electricity intra-day forward contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Raphaël Homayoun Boroumand
  • Stéphane Goutte
  • Simon Porcher
  • Thomas Porcher

Abstract

As market intermediaries, electricity retailers purchase electricity from the wholesale market or self-generate to 'deliver' to their customers. However, electricity retailers are uncertain about how much electricity their residential customers will use at any moment of the day until the customers actually turn on their switches. While demand uncertainty is a common feature of all commodity markets, retailers generally rely on storage to manage it. Individually, electricity retailers are exposed to joint volumetric and price risk on an hourly basis given the physical attributes of electricity. In the literature on electricity markets, few articles compare the efficiency of forward contracts, options and physical assets (i.e., power plants) within intra-day hourly hedging portfolios, while electricity markets are precisely hourly markets. We analyse portfolios composed of forward contracts and/or power plants for specific hourly clusters based on electricity market data from 2013 to 2015 from the integrated German-Austrian spot market. Using a VaR and CVaR model, we prove that intra-day hedging with forward contracts is structurally inefficient compared to financial options and physical assets, no matter the cluster hour.

Suggested Citation

  • Raphaël Homayoun Boroumand & Stéphane Goutte & Simon Porcher & Thomas Porcher, 2017. "Risk minimisation: the failure of electricity intra-day forward contracts," International Journal of Global Energy Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 40(5), pages 335-343.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijgeni:v:40:y:2017:i:5:p:335-343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=86847
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijgeni:v:40:y:2017:i:5:p:335-343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=13 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.