IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeven/v4y2012i1p42-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Click clack: examining the strategic and entrepreneurial brand vision of Under Armour

Author

Listed:
  • Kimberly S. Miloch
  • Jason Lee
  • Patrick M. Kraft
  • Vanessa Ratten

Abstract

Using non-traditional brand strategy and innovative techniques, Under Armour quickly established a dominant presence in the sport performance apparel market as a newcomer in its product category. It established strong brand equity among consumers through its messaging and authentic relationship with target consumers. Utilising marketing and brand management theories, this study analysed the entrepreneurial strategies implemented by Under Armour in establishing the company's current positioning in the sport performance apparel marketplace. Using Aaker's (2005) strategic market management theory and Porter's (1980) competitive forces model as a framework, this study analysed the different marketing methods utilised to develop, maintain, and sustain the Under Armour brand.

Suggested Citation

  • Kimberly S. Miloch & Jason Lee & Patrick M. Kraft & Vanessa Ratten, 2012. "Click clack: examining the strategic and entrepreneurial brand vision of Under Armour," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1), pages 42-57.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeven:v:4:y:2012:i:1:p:42-57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44817
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ted Hayduk & Matthew Walker, 2018. "Mapping the strategic factor market for sport entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 705-724, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeven:v:4:y:2012:i:1:p:42-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=123 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.