IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijetma/v6y2006i6p612-630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study on performance of yeast and bacterial membrane bioreactors for high salinity wastewater treatment

Author

Listed:
  • N.P. Dan
  • C. Visvanathan
  • R. Ben Aim
  • V. Jegatheesan

Abstract

Two laboratory-scale membrane bioreactor systems were investigated to treat high saline wastewater containing 1,000 mg/L COD and 32 g/L NaCl, namely: the yeast membrane bioreactor (YMBR) and the bacterial membrane bioreactor (BMBR). COD removal of both processes was above 90% at a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 5 hours (volumetric loading of 5 kg COD/m³.d), sludge retention time (SRT) of 50 days (the MLSS of above 14 g/L and the F/M of 0.4 d-1). Under these operating conditions, the YMBR could run at a ten-fold lower transmembrane pressure with significantly reduced membrane fouling rate compared to BMBR. This may be because of low production of adhesive extracellular polymers (ECP) and the secondary filtration layer formed from large yeast cells. ECP production of bacterial sludge was increased considerably at high salt concentrations (32 g/L and 45 g/L) and long SRTs. For the bacterial sludge, the increased salinity led to increase in ECP, whereas the ECP content of the yeast sludge was relatively small.

Suggested Citation

  • N.P. Dan & C. Visvanathan & R. Ben Aim & V. Jegatheesan, 2006. "Comparative study on performance of yeast and bacterial membrane bioreactors for high salinity wastewater treatment," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(6), pages 612-630.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:6:y:2006:i:6:p:612-630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=11901
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:6:y:2006:i:6:p:612-630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=11 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.