IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijetma/v13y2010i1p37-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative methods to control water infiltration for landfills: a case study in the tropics

Author

Listed:
  • Chittaranjan Ray
  • Clifton Miyasaki
  • Michal Snehota
  • Laxman Sharma
  • Martin Sanda

Abstract

Landfill caps made of synthetic materials are expensive. Compacted clay caps are also subject to desiccation cracks which negate the overall purpose of infiltration reduction. Vegetative cover caps, also called evapotranspiration covers, have been tested in arid climates. In this research, a vegetative cover using a naturally occurring soil of Hawaii was tested. As the annual rainfall at the site is more than the evapotranspiration demand, a portion of the run-off was routed offsite using run-off-enhancing structures such as rain gutters. The site contained six test plots on 4% slopes to simulate different components of water balance: two control plots, two plots with 20% surface area covered by the gutters and two more plots with 40% area covered by the gutters. The gutters were spaced uniformly and enhanced run-off in early stages of vegetation growth. With growth, the vegetation covered the gutters and the gutters did not receive as much rainwater. The difference in run-off between the 20% and 40% was not significant. If the gutters had been placed at a single location in the plots, they would not have been covered with vegetation, thus making them effective to produce runoff in most stages of vegetation growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Chittaranjan Ray & Clifton Miyasaki & Michal Snehota & Laxman Sharma & Martin Sanda, 2010. "Alternative methods to control water infiltration for landfills: a case study in the tropics," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 37-50.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:13:y:2010:i:1:p:37-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:13:y:2010:i:1:p:37-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=11 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.