IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijetma/v10y2009i2p223-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental and sustainability impact assessment in small islands: the case of Azores and Madeira

Author

Listed:
  • Tomas B. Ramos
  • Sandra Caeiro
  • Calbert H. Douglas
  • Cocker Ochieng

Abstract

This paper compares Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) practices and effectiveness in the Portuguese islands of the Azores and Madeira. This was accomplished by qualitative appraisal and evaluation of the contents of EIA statements and the characterisation of the EIA practices. Data was collected from the islands' regional environmental agencies and from the Environmental Portuguese Agency internet database. The findings reveal that most EIA project practitioners and consultants in the islands are associated with the regional government agencies. Proposals were generally approved with 'conditions' and the diversity of project types were lower in the islands than in the mainland. There was limited follow-up on the EIA process so that evaluation of conditions compliance was scanty. Key areas identified for consideration in the development of good impact assessment practice in the islands included, the Islands' unique geographical and ecological characteristics, scale effects, intra-insular regional dimension, impact significance evaluation approaches, and training, education and development skills in EIA processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomas B. Ramos & Sandra Caeiro & Calbert H. Douglas & Cocker Ochieng, 2009. "Environmental and sustainability impact assessment in small islands: the case of Azores and Madeira," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 223-240.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:10:y:2009:i:2:p:223-240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=23523
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:10:y:2009:i:2:p:223-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=11 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.