IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijesbu/v54y2025i4p559-571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of perceived organisational justice on ethical behaviour in work environments

Author

Listed:
  • Vjosë Latifi
  • Gadaf Rexhepi
  • Veland Ramadani
  • Agron Hajdari
  • Iliriana Miftari

Abstract

The aim of this research is to investigate the effects of perceived organisational justice on ethical behaviour in work environments. The quantitative approach was employed in this study to grasp and validate the conceptual framework. The research was guided by a positivist survey research technique. A questionnaire was used as a data collection tool and 200 employees are involved in the study. SEM with SmartPLS was also employed as a data analysis tool. This study adds a better understanding of organisational justice's role in employees' ethical behaviour. In terms of practical contributions, the research offers suggestions for governments, policymakers, and the business community regarding how to recognise and incorporate the effects of perceived organisational justice on ethical behaviour in the work environment. The main findings of the research show that organisational justice has a positive relationship on the ethical behaviour of employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Vjosë Latifi & Gadaf Rexhepi & Veland Ramadani & Agron Hajdari & Iliriana Miftari, 2025. "The effects of perceived organisational justice on ethical behaviour in work environments," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 54(4), pages 559-571.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:54:y:2025:i:4:p:559-571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=144768
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:54:y:2025:i:4:p:559-571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=74 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.