IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijesbu/v33y2018i2p176-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives on success from indigenous entrepreneurs in Northern Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Beau J. Austin
  • Stephen T. Garnett

Abstract

Development of success metrics can assist entrepreneurs achieve their goals more effectively, demonstrate achievements, attract new investment/partners and build public support. However, metrics of success are based on subjective worldviews. In Australia, indigenous peoples' 'performance' has usually been evaluated from the perspective of the dominant culture, rarely with reference to the views of the indigenous entrepreneurs themselves. This paper seeks first to outline the problematic nature of defining success, exploring the issue and potential options using three case studies of indigenous enterprises in remote Northern Australia that use wild harvested plants and animals commercially. Actors associated with each of these case studies were asked whether they thought they were successful and the reasons behind their self-appraisal. This research opens space to discuss alternative approaches to measuring indigenous enterprise success that acknowledge and respect cultural and contextual difference. Evaluations of the performance of indigenous entrepreneurs must start broad, embrace indigenous worldviews, consider context, be adaptive to changed circumstances and/or aspirations, see non-financial goals as legitimate and important, use shared definitions of success, and provide entrepreneurs and development agents (government, NGOs, corporates, etc.) with the training, tools and resources to evaluate and communicate their own success.

Suggested Citation

  • Beau J. Austin & Stephen T. Garnett, 2018. "Perspectives on success from indigenous entrepreneurs in Northern Australia," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 33(2), pages 176-201.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:33:y:2018:i:2:p:176-201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=90134
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandra Langford & Geoffrey Lawrence & Kiah Smith, 2021. "Financialization for Development? Asset Making on Indigenous Land in Remote Northern Australia," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 574-597, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:33:y:2018:i:2:p:176-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=74 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.