IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijesbu/v32y2017i1-2p79-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two models of representation for the baby boom and millennium generations in France: 'elitist identity capital' v. 'universal, democratic capital'

Author

Listed:
  • Thierry Lorey

Abstract

Profound changes in France's wine-drinking habits (reduced consumption, rise of rosé wine, etc.) have occurred alongside long-term societal phenomena such as increased life expectancy and the internet revolution. The aim of this article is to analyse these developments from the angle of the concept of generation, initially defined by American sociologists. Two qualitative studies carried out five years apart and focusing on France's two largest generations, revealed a distinct generation gap between baby boomers and millennials in terms of 'representations of wine' and 'wine culture'. Our results show that the system of representation for both generations is based on two opposing socio-cultural wine models: an 'elitist identity capital' for the baby boomers, integrating the following four dimensions: France, terroir, history and gastronomy; and a 'democratic and universal capital' for the millennium generation, capitalising on four values (simplicity, accessibility/shedding of complexes, sharing and instant gratification). These two comprehensive models are reflected in specific marketing strategies for each of the generations.

Suggested Citation

  • Thierry Lorey, 2017. "Two models of representation for the baby boom and millennium generations in France: 'elitist identity capital' v. 'universal, democratic capital'," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 32(1/2), pages 79-101.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:32:y:2017:i:1/2:p:79-101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=85986
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:32:y:2017:i:1/2:p:79-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=74 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.