IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijesbu/v2y2005i2p178-187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Focus on regulation theory

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Buckingham
  • Leo Paul Dana

Abstract

The struggles of indigenous peoples for recognition of their rights to their customary land and resources are almost as common as the treaties that guide them. Governments of many countries have been, or are currently, involved in creating redress packages for these indigenous people. The people of these native groups often live in sub-standard socio-economic conditions, having low incomes and high unemployment. The way in which indigenous people use the redress packages or settlements will have substantial effects on their long-term socio-economic status. This paper looks at economic development theory, in particular, regulation theory, focusing on how indigenous peoples' rights to land and resources, and the settlements that result, can be utilised to create sustainable economic development. It draws from the experience of the New Zealand Maori, in particular the Ngai Tahu and Tainui tribes, to outline in terms of their land rights and how their ability to exercise these rights have affected economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Buckingham & Leo Paul Dana, 2005. "Focus on regulation theory," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 178-187.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:2:y:2005:i:2:p:178-187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=6813
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leo Paul Dana & Teresa E. Dana, 2007. "How do self-employed Sami people perceive the impact of the EU and globalisation?," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 3-19.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:2:y:2005:i:2:p:178-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=74 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.