IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijesbu/v29y2016i2p244-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The innovation process in firms with border region location

Author

Listed:
  • John-Erik Andreassen

Abstract

The paper focuses on how the uncertainty in innovation processes created by intertwined technological and commercial forces is managed in border region (BR) firms. The aim of the research is to study the firms' capability to innovate, and to investigate the firms' innovative status within a framework of high-involvement innovation. In the three cases in the study, the managers of the researched firms focus on the need for innovation management and organisational change to thrive in the manufacturing industry in Østfold and Västra Götaland characterised by global competition and advanced technology. The empirical findings show that diffusion of innovations is not only dependent on the flow of information on user characteristics in a user-producer interaction, but also on the organisational structure of a firm. A producer organised as a cost-centre in a corporation might be a factor that influences the close relationship needed to innovate successfully. The major findings describe the innovative status of the researched firms, and provide analysis of and discuss the firms' capabilities to involve employees in innovation. Based upon the firms' level of high involvement innovation and organisational culture, the framework applied provides insight into how to identify capabilities, or cluster of behaviour, required to develop the investigated organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • John-Erik Andreassen, 2016. "The innovation process in firms with border region location," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 29(2), pages 244-270.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:29:y:2016:i:2:p:244-270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=78703
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:29:y:2016:i:2:p:244-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=74 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.