IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijepee/v11y2018i1-2p26-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing models of the measuring performance of mutual fund based on single and dual beta

Author

Listed:
  • V. Santi Paramita
  • Horas Djulius
  • Ardi Gunardi
  • Eka Yulianti

Abstract

This study aims to test some models of mutual fund performance measurement with regard to the impact of time-varying beta volatility. Testing of models based on three issues: first, the single beta testing; second, dual beta testing; and third determining which model is the most valid and robust. Tests for each models uses a two-pass regression. Testing of comparison model uses a nested model. The research samples were 30 stock mutual funds in the Indonesian capital market period January 2008-December 2012. The results research showed three finding. The first, the single beta testing indicated that these three models were not valid and were not robust. The second, dual beta testing indicated that Treynor-Mazuy model and Paramita model were valid. The third, test of robustness model showed that Paramita model was the most robust than two other models and proved that the market return variable had explanatory power as a determinant factor of mutual fund returns.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Santi Paramita & Horas Djulius & Ardi Gunardi & Eka Yulianti, 2018. "Testing models of the measuring performance of mutual fund based on single and dual beta," International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1/2), pages 26-39.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijepee:v:11:y:2018:i:1/2:p:26-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=91029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijepee:v:11:y:2018:i:1/2:p:26-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=219 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.