IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijenma/v3y2009i2p112-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A hybrid decision model for the selection of capital equipment using AHP in conjoint analysis under fuzziness

Author

Listed:
  • P. Parthiban
  • M. Punniyamoorthy
  • P. Mathiyalagan
  • P.D.D. Dominic

Abstract

Strategic level decision-making is very complex in nature because it consists of numerous variables and most of which cannot be quantified. These decisions are assisted based on the information available, which are both qualitative and quantitative. When comparing of different alternatives, the decision-maker should consider both the tangible and intangible benefits of different alternatives, i.e., fuzziness. The decision may be wrong if one considers only the tangible benefits of the alternatives. So, the intangible benefits should also be considered while making the decision. Generally, it is difficult to quantify these intangible benefits, because they are often fuzzy, complicated and subjective. So, there is a need of a methodology to evaluate both tangible and intangible benefits simultaneously. The conjoint analysis is applied to arrive at the relative weightage for the attributes and the part worth values for the levels using techniques like dummy regression, linear programming and to find an alternative method to arrive at the relative weightage and part worth values in conjoint analysis using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Validation of the model was done through a real-time example.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Parthiban & M. Punniyamoorthy & P. Mathiyalagan & P.D.D. Dominic, 2009. "A hybrid decision model for the selection of capital equipment using AHP in conjoint analysis under fuzziness," International Journal of Enterprise Network Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2), pages 112-129.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijenma:v:3:y:2009:i:2:p:112-129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=29006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijenma:v:3:y:2009:i:2:p:112-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=187 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.