IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeima/v21y2017i6p459-484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is social innovation about innovation? A bibliometric study identifying the main authors, citations and co-citations over 20 years

Author

Listed:
  • Franciane Freitas Silveira
  • Silvia Novaes Zilber

Abstract

The aim of this study was to map and analyse the scenario of scientific production with respect to social innovation through a bibliometric study, using the Scopus database, contributing to future studies on this topic. We identified the main themes addressed in the field and the main authors, works and citations, in addition to analysing a co-citation map and determining whether the term 'social innovation' depends on the field of innovation. The results show that the most commonly cited key words are 'innovation' and 'social entrepreneurism', demonstrating their complementarity. The number of citations has grown in recent years, demonstrating an opportunity to conduct academic studies in the field and an opportunity to conduct quantitative studies, given that the articles examined in this study were theoretical and qualitative in nature. Apparently, innovation is not the main field in which this theme is analysed; rather, institutional theory, social entrepreneurship and public policy constitute the main theoretical framework found in this work.

Suggested Citation

  • Franciane Freitas Silveira & Silvia Novaes Zilber, 2017. "Is social innovation about innovation? A bibliometric study identifying the main authors, citations and co-citations over 20 years," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(6), pages 459-484.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeima:v:21:y:2017:i:6:p:459-484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=86936
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julián David Cortés-Sánchez, 2019. "Innovation in Latin America through the lens of bibliometrics: crammed and fading away," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(2), pages 869-895, November.
    2. de Souza João-Roland, Iraci & Granados, Maria L., 2023. "Towards social innovation strategy: An analysis of UK social enterprises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    3. Georg M. Eichler & Erich J. Schwarz, 2019. "What Sustainable Development Goals Do Social Innovations Address? A Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Social Innovation Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Aakanksha Kataria & Satish Kumar & Nitesh Pandey, 2021. "Twenty‐five years of Gender, Work and Organization: A bibliometric analysis," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 85-118, January.
    5. Paola Bernardi & Alberto Bertello & Canio Forliano & Ludovico Bullini Orlandi, 2022. "Beyond the “ivory tower”. Comparing academic and non-academic knowledge on social entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 999-1032, September.
    6. Satish Kumar & Riya Sureka & Weng Marc Lim & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Nisha Goyal, 2021. "What do we know about business strategy and environmental research? Insights from Business Strategy and the Environment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3454-3469, December.
    7. Baker, H. Kent & Kumar, Satish & Pattnaik, Debidutta, 2021. "Twenty-five years of the Journal of Corporate Finance: A scientometric analysis," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Kushagra Kulshreshtha & Vikas Tripathi & Naval Bajpai, 2018. "1971–2017: Evolution, exploration and test of time of conjoint analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 2893-2919, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeima:v:21:y:2017:i:6:p:459-484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=7 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.