IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeima/v10y2009i2p138-161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of formally documented NPD processes, decision-making centralisation and NPD performance on organisational competitiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Murray R. Millson
  • David Wilemon

Abstract

The focus of our research is to better understand factors that appear to impact the success of new products. We specifically investigate what happens to four measures of new product success when viewed through the lenses of several important factors associated with the NPD process. We suggest that a workable understanding of factors that discriminate between more and less successful new products can increase a firm's competitiveness. Survey instruments were received from NPD managers employed by 91 firms that were randomly selected from a sampling frame of 415 organisations primarily operating in the US medical devices industry. Our research suggests a firm's decision making centralisation and an organisation's new product development (NPD) process formalisation and documentation do not discriminate between the more successful and less successful products in the medical devices industry. Moreover, overall marketing performance does not discriminate between more successful and less successful products but technical performance does.

Suggested Citation

  • Murray R. Millson & David Wilemon, 2009. "The impact of formally documented NPD processes, decision-making centralisation and NPD performance on organisational competitiveness," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 138-161.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeima:v:10:y:2009:i:2:p:138-161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=25179
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeima:v:10:y:2009:i:2:p:138-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=7 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.