IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeded/v16y2025i1-2p199-208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teachers' perceptions about professional motivation and well-being: an actual perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Helena Dias
  • Inês Oliveira Gonçalves
  • Susana Sá
  • Joana Costa
  • João Pascoinho
  • Aldina Sofia Silva

Abstract

At COVID-19 health crisis, teachers were considered first-line professionals in education. Nevertheless, the impact of the teaching career statute revision, teachers' social and economic devaluation, the school management and administration model, and teachers' performance assessment is still a cause of demotivation and dissatisfaction. Therefore, our aim was to understand the motivation and well-being of teachers with the educational policies applied in recent years. For that, a questionnaire was applied to 238 teachers. Subjects were not very motivated, unsatisfied with their profession, little recognised, and perceived their working conditions as unsatisfactory. Moreover, there is an unsatisfactory perception of leadership and their professional future. In conclusion, teachers reveal they were exhausted and unmotivated with their professional conditions due to the educational policies applied in recent years, the statute of the teaching career the main cause of the discomfort, namely teaching performance assessment and the lack of professional social recognition.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Dias & Inês Oliveira Gonçalves & Susana Sá & Joana Costa & João Pascoinho & Aldina Sofia Silva, 2025. "Teachers' perceptions about professional motivation and well-being: an actual perspective," International Journal of Education Economics and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1/2), pages 199-208.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeded:v:16:y:2025:i:1/2:p:199-208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=143624
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeded:v:16:y:2025:i:1/2:p:199-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=346 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.