IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeded/v16y2025i1-2p159-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The perceptions of experience and satisfaction after the implementation of the electronic information system - SEI at the Federal Institute of Rondônia

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Paula Camarinha
  • António Abreu
  • Marcelo Tenório Matos Júnior

Abstract

The Federal Institute of Rondônia - IFRO has been using 2017, the Electronic Information System - SEI for the execution of administrative activities. This research sought to analyse the perceptions of experience and satisfaction of employees separating them into two groups: employees of the institution who participated in the implementation of the system and employees who entered the institution after the implementation of the system. This quantitative and exploratory research used a questionnaire to collect the data. The respondents were separated into two groups, with the time of work in the institution as a milestone. To compare the groups, the Mann-Whitney test (U test) was used, where it was possible to observe that there was no significant difference between the two groups in the construct 'experience' and there was a difference in the construct 'satisfaction', which suggests concluding that employees perceive satisfaction differently from the group in which they are inserted.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Paula Camarinha & António Abreu & Marcelo Tenório Matos Júnior, 2025. "The perceptions of experience and satisfaction after the implementation of the electronic information system - SEI at the Federal Institute of Rondônia," International Journal of Education Economics and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1/2), pages 159-171.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeded:v:16:y:2025:i:1/2:p:159-171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=143623
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeded:v:16:y:2025:i:1/2:p:159-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=346 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.