IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v9y2015i1p100-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The mechanisms of information integration in experimental prediction markets

Author

Listed:
  • Richard D. Jolly
  • Martin Zwick
  • Wayne Wakeland
  • James Woods

Abstract

The desire to understand the mechanisms of market information integration motivates this study. Large sample experimental prediction markets with varying feedback mechanisms afforded the study of aggregate and individual's actions. Markets without feedback demonstrated information collection by outperforming the average of their participants. When feedback was introduced the inductive process of information aggregation was observed. This process was seen to simultaneously increase the amount of information assimilated, but also introduce information mirages which tend to decrease the accuracy of the markets - being dependent on the type of data presented to the market. In fact, a market subject to mirage prone data resembles a prisoner's dilemma where individual rationality results in collective irrationality. Individual's responses with feedback revealed characteristics of public and private information integration. Integration for individuals was subtle compared to the more distinct effect in markets, illustrating the emergent nature of information aggregation in markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard D. Jolly & Martin Zwick & Wayne Wakeland & James Woods, 2015. "The mechanisms of information integration in experimental prediction markets," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 100-129.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:100-129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=66032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:100-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.