IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v5y2013i4p363-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality disclosure and certification in the motorcycle industry

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Mangani

Abstract

This paper studies the practise of quality disclosure and quality certification of sellers and experts in the Italian motorcycle industry between 2007 and 2010. Motorcycles are a combination of search, experience and credence attributes and consumers cannot observe product quality perfectly. Empirical analysis shows that the vertical and horizontal characteristics of motorcycles do not have a clear impact on the sellers' decisions to disclose product quality. At the same time, specialist journals do not favour any specific motorcycle category when they choose which model to test. With respect to the results of the tests, the quality disclosed by motorcycle companies is systematically biased upward, but only slightly. On the whole, market efficiency is not threatened by asymmetric information and credence attributes.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Mangani, 2013. "Quality disclosure and certification in the motorcycle industry," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(4), pages 363-378.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:5:y:2013:i:4:p:363-378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=54253
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang Guo, 2020. "Upstream Exploitation and Strategic Disclosure," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(5), pages 923-938, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:5:y:2013:i:4:p:363-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.