IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v27y2024i4p553-567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Amicable settlements for civil and commercial disputes: a comparative study of Emirati and Egyptian legislations

Author

Listed:
  • Moustafa Elmetwaly Kandeel
  • Ali Abdel Mahdi Massadeh
  • Firas Abdel-Mahdi Massadeh

Abstract

Non-compulsory amicable dispute resolutions were examined by reviewing the legal nature and concept of mediation and conciliation within the legislations of the UAE and Egypt, in line with contemporary international legislations, such as that of France. We considered those civil and commercial law disputes which may be subject to amicable dispute resolution in pre-trial proceedings, including labour and family law matters and intellectual property rights. Within the latest legislative amended provisions, we also focused on whether the role of the judiciary within the amicable dispute resolution process is an efficient means of conciliation/mediation, and found that some modification of the respective Egyptian and Emirati judicial roles concerning the appointment of a conciliator/mediator is required. With regard to reaching an independent agreement, we present a potential model for doing so via amicable dispute resolution which is based on judicial procedures and strict binding stipulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Moustafa Elmetwaly Kandeel & Ali Abdel Mahdi Massadeh & Firas Abdel-Mahdi Massadeh, 2024. "Amicable settlements for civil and commercial disputes: a comparative study of Emirati and Egyptian legislations," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 27(4), pages 553-567.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:27:y:2024:i:4:p:553-567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=138871
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:27:y:2024:i:4:p:553-567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.