IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v1y2009i3p263-276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ethics of future business leaders: a cross-cultural comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Graham Elkin
  • Stuart King

Abstract

Undergraduate students in general and business students in particular are the future leaders of both private and public corporations. To anticipate their future behaviour and to develop ideas about undergraduate business education, an understanding of student attitudes towards business ethics is needed. Attempts at developing universal business ethics are problematic due to major influence of culture and sub-culture on these attitudes. Attention can be more usefully focussed on pairs of countries. Our research examined attitudes towards business ethics among business students in the USA and New Zealand. We surveyed New Zealand undergraduate business students regarding their attitudes towards a number of statements about business ethics. These findings were compared to a survey conducted in the USA by Albaum and Peterson (2006) 'Ethical attitudes of future business leaders: do they vary by gender and religiosity?', Business and Society, Vol. 45, pp.300-321. Our survey findings generally reflected the literature that the USA and New Zealand business students, having similar cultural backgrounds, display a range of similar attitudes. However, we found that gender and religiosity have a greater influence on ethical attitudes in the USA than they do in New Zealand. We make some suggestions for ethics education.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham Elkin & Stuart King, 2009. "The ethics of future business leaders: a cross-cultural comparison," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 263-276.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:1:y:2009:i:3:p:263-276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=24303
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:1:y:2009:i:3:p:263-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.