IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecac/v4y2013i2p169-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining belief adjustment model on investment decision making

Author

Listed:
  • Luciana Spica Almilia
  • Supriyadi

Abstract

This research aims to examine the influence of order effects and response mode [a step by step (SbS) and an end of sequence (EoS)] or belief adjustment model on investment decisions making. The contribution of this research to the accounting literature is the existence of Belief Adjustment model developed by Hogarth and Einhorn that will be tested in this study in setting the investment decision. Experiment method is used to examine the research hypotheses. Final participant(s) in this research were (are) 93 people who are accounting students majoring in accounting at the private university in Surabaya, Indonesia. The results of this study show that a step by step (SbS) response mode tends to find significant recency effect, while judgment that require only one judgment at the end of the evidence series. Meanwhile, an end of sequence (EoS) response mode tends to find no recency effect. Practical implications of the research is to understand the impact of the presentation of accounting information, the order of information presentation, and the presentation of information investment decision pattern. For the Capital Market Supervisory Agency (BAPEPAM), this research may contribute to setting policies related to information order and disclosure pattern.

Suggested Citation

  • Luciana Spica Almilia & Supriyadi, 2013. "Examining belief adjustment model on investment decision making," International Journal of Economics and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(2), pages 169-183.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:4:y:2013:i:2:p:169-183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=55171
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Almilia Luciana S. & Dewi Nurul H. U. & Wulanditya Putri, 2019. "The effect of visualization and complexity tasks in investment decision making," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 68-77, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:4:y:2013:i:2:p:169-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=357 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.