IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecac/v3y2012i3-4p365-385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Egyptian auditing investigated: diagnoses and remedies

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed A. Wahdan
  • H. Jaap Van den Herik

Abstract

The paper aims at diagnosing the present status of the auditing profession in Egypt which is characterised by the co-existence of two different groups of auditors: a) auditors with an academic degree; b) practitioners. To diagnose the current auditing status and to explore the unique features that characterise the Egyptian auditing community, we formulate eight hypotheses after a thorough literature review. The core research activities described in the paper are: 1) diagnosing the status of the auditing profession in Egypt; 2) remedying the auditing deficits. The findings of the study indicate that there is a general agreement on: 1) the lack of experience and expertise; 2) the weakness of professional ethics; 3) the variations among the auditors' judgments. However, significant differences exist between the two groups of auditors regarding the lack of experience, expertise, and professional ethics.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed A. Wahdan & H. Jaap Van den Herik, 2012. "Egyptian auditing investigated: diagnoses and remedies," International Journal of Economics and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3/4), pages 365-385.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:3:y:2012:i:3/4:p:365-385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=49078
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:3:y:2012:i:3/4:p:365-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=357 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.