IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecac/v1y2010i3p223-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contra contractarianism

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel D. Donleavy

Abstract

Classical ethics are universal in their claims to bind people, but the field of business ethics has been especially vulnerable to ethical relativism. Within the field of jurisprudence there has been an attempt to decouple law from ethics by arguing law has an inner morality divorceable from its substantive provisions. Van Oosterhout et al. (2006) import this approach into the field of business relations in general and business contracts in particular. They claim integrated social contract theory is the best ethical paradigm for business, because it admits as ethics only what contracting parties have agreed to and a tiny number of additional norms that are generally accepted in the applicable business community. This attempt to privatise ethics is critically deconstructed in the present paper, by way of challenging a potentially virulent strain of ethical relativism.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel D. Donleavy, 2010. "Contra contractarianism," International Journal of Economics and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 223-231.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:1:y:2010:i:3:p:223-231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=36804
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:1:y:2010:i:3:p:223-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=357 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.