IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecac/v10y2021i3p278-298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential market redistribution following a big four accounting firm failure

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth A. Donovan
  • Charles Graves
  • Amanda M. Grossman
  • Dan Harris

Abstract

This work investigates potential market effects of the hypothetical failure of a big four accounting firm, emphasising how audit and accounting services would be redistributed among the remaining firms. Using graph-theoretic techniques and historical data based upon the failure of Arthur Andersen in 2002, three models of a post-failure redistribution of services are considered. The first model assumes that no mergers/acquisitions occur post-failure amongst the largest accounting firms, besides the redistribution of the failed firm's employees and clients. The second and third models assume that several non-big four firms merge together to create 'the merger', which becomes the approximate size of the pre-failure firm. The results indicate that at least two of the remaining 'big' firms would switch ranks in terms of global revenues, and that the merger becomes as comparatively efficient as the continuing 'big' firms when measured by average revenues generated per employee.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth A. Donovan & Charles Graves & Amanda M. Grossman & Dan Harris, 2021. "Potential market redistribution following a big four accounting firm failure," International Journal of Economics and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 278-298.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:278-298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=116698
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:278-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=357 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.