IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecac/v10y2021i2p231-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-term comparability of accounting information in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Yo Isokawa

Abstract

This study examines the tendency of accounting information comparability in Japan over the 30-year period from 1988 to 2017. Several prior studies testing accounting information's usefulness indicate that value relevance tends to decline over the long term. Accounting information's comparability is another aspect of its usefulness. Even if value relevance declines over time, improved comparability can enhance the usefulness of accounting information. This study provides a long-term analysis from the perspective of De Franco et al. (2011) idea of comparability. The results show that comparability in Japan also tends to decline over the long term and did not improve with convergence with the International Financial Reporting Standards. However, comparability tended to improve after 2012. The additional analysis shows that the bid-ask spread rate decreases as comparability improves. Thus, comparability declined in Japan, and asymmetric information is expanding.

Suggested Citation

  • Yo Isokawa, 2021. "Long-term comparability of accounting information in Japan," International Journal of Economics and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 231-247.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:231-247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=115242
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:231-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=357 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.