IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijdmmm/v17y2025i1p75-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of distance measures in stock network construction and cluster analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Serkan Alkan

Abstract

The mutual information (MI) metric and the Pearson correlation metric are both widely used in cluster analysis and stock network construction. This paper presents a detailed comparison between the MI metric and the Pearson correlation metric. To detect nonlinear relationships, polynomial and natural cubic spline regressions are proposed as alternatives to the MI metric. The methodology for computing model-fitting indices for determining network adjacencies is explained in detail, along with a comparison of the results with the MI methodology. This study employs two data sets derived from the log returns of the daily adjusted closing prices of 402 stocks in the S%P500 index to measure the impact of a financial crisis on nonlinearity: one covering the crisis period from January 2007 to December 2009, and the other covering the non-crisis period between January 2012 and December 2015. The local and global properties of hierarchical stock networks are compared using the minimum spanning tree for each distance measure. The graph-theoretic internal cluster validity indices and external indices are also used to investigate the relationship between the performance of the community detection algorithm and the selection of metrics.

Suggested Citation

  • Serkan Alkan, 2025. "Comparative analysis of distance measures in stock network construction and cluster analysis," International Journal of Data Mining, Modelling and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1), pages 75-102.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijdmmm:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:75-102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=144614
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijdmmm:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:75-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=342 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.