IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijdmmm/v13y2021i4p351-363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the impact of preprocessing on document embedding: an empirical comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Nourelhouda Yahi
  • Hacene Belhadef
  • Mathieu Roche

Abstract

Digital representation of text documents is a crucial task in machine learning and natural language processing (NLP). It aims to transform unstructured text documents into mathematically-computable elements. In recent years, several methods have been proposed and implemented to encode text documents into fixed-length feature vectors. This operation is known as document embedding and it has become an interesting and open area of research. Paragraph vector (Doc2vec) is one of the most used document embedding methods. It has gained a good reputation thanks to its good results. To overcome its limits, Doc2vec, was extended by proposing the document through corruption (Doc2vecC) technique. To get a deep view of these two methods, this work presents a study on the impact of morphosyntactic text preprocessing on these two document embedding methods. We have done this analysis by applying the most-used text preprocessing techniques, such as cleaning, stemming and lemmatisation, and their different combinations. The experimental analysis on the Microsoft Research Paraphrase dataset (MSRP), reveals that the preprocessing techniques serve to improve the classifier accuracy; and that the stemming method outperforms the other techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Nourelhouda Yahi & Hacene Belhadef & Mathieu Roche, 2021. "Investigating the impact of preprocessing on document embedding: an empirical comparison," International Journal of Data Mining, Modelling and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(4), pages 351-363.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijdmmm:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:351-363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=119631
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijdmmm:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:351-363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=342 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.