IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcrac/v5y2013i3p250-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons from the global financial crisis: bringing neoclassical and Buddhist economics theories together to progress global business decision making in the 21st century

Author

Listed:
  • Umesh Sharma

Abstract

The aim of this paper is examine how moral failure shaped the global financial crisis with particular attention to the role of neoclassical economics theory. The paper compares the premises and characteristics of Schumacher's (1973) Buddhist economics with the prevailing neoclassical economics, illustrating the narrowness of the current perspective and highlighting the critical issues. Expanding on the Buddhist economics (BE), the paper explicates how such a theory can be integrated with neoclassical economics to facilitate moral and ethical values in society. The paper considers the lessons to be learnt from the global financial crisis and calls for greater consideration of Buddhist economics in business decision making in the 21st century. A synthesis of the two-neoclassical economics perspective and BE may create a holistic view of management and economics which recognises that people matter. This may go in some length to avoid a further financial crisis of the kind we experienced recently.

Suggested Citation

  • Umesh Sharma, 2013. "Lessons from the global financial crisis: bringing neoclassical and Buddhist economics theories together to progress global business decision making in the 21st century," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(3), pages 250-263.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:250-263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=55478
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:250-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=328 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.