IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcrac/v4y2012i5-6p511-541.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting the regulation of auditor independence: Spanish evidence on different perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Maria A. García-Benau
  • Ana Zorio

Abstract

Following the dramatic financial scandals at the turn of the millennium, the financial system reporting framework has changed considerably to restore confidence among investors. In 2002, Spain was one of the pioneer EU member countries to regulate audit quality and protect auditor independence. In the specific setting of Spain, the objective of this research is to obtain evidence that can contribute to the debate on whether there is a need for regulation in this field. In this sense, we find evidence on the existence of an expectations gap between two groups of agents affected by the important changes that the 2002 rules on independence and audit quality imposed on auditors, i.e., the auditors themselves and the academics who educate future auditors. Our results point out that there is an expectations gap both in terms of independence in fact and in appearance for certain items under study, as well as in the area of improvement in audit quality or in the opinions on how these regulatory changes are expected to affect auditors' activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria A. García-Benau & Ana Zorio, 2012. "Revisiting the regulation of auditor independence: Spanish evidence on different perceptions," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(5/6), pages 511-541.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:4:y:2012:i:5/6:p:511-541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=51463
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:4:y:2012:i:5/6:p:511-541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=328 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.