IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcrac/v2y2010i1p64-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Audit committee reports and corporate governance in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Akintola Owolabi
  • Chris Ogbechie

Abstract

Audit committees are said to be important mechanisms of corporate governance. The aim of this research is to assess the quality of audit committee reports in annual reports and accounts by specifically measuring their conformance with the provisions of the Nigerian Companies and Allied Matters Act 1990. Of the 260 reports selected five years post Enron (2002-2006) for analysis, only 134 (52%) were available. The empirical results indicate that the reports (mostly unqualified) do not support public opinion and an earlier study on the credibility of financial report in Nigeria [see for example, Reports on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) (2004) by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)]. It is also at variance with the allegations of financial statement fraud committed by high profile companies in Nigeria (e.g., Unilever and Cadbury). An improvement in the quality of audit committee reports should enhance the credibility and transparency of financial report.

Suggested Citation

  • Akintola Owolabi & Chris Ogbechie, 2010. "Audit committee reports and corporate governance in Nigeria," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 64-78.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:2:y:2010:i:1:p:64-78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=30338
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peterson K. Ozili, 2021. "Corporate governance research in Nigeria: a review," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-32, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:2:y:2010:i:1:p:64-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=328 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.