IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcrac/v1y2009i1-2p144-176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural change in the music industry: a Marxist critique of public statements made by members of Metallica during the lawsuit against Napster

Author

Listed:
  • Kieran James
  • Christopher Tolliday

Abstract

The music industry is undergoing extremely rapid structural change not of its own choosing and record labels will no longer be able to rely on coercive seven-record deals and business methods that have remained unchanged since the 1960s. This paper provides a case study of the 2000-2001 lawsuit by extreme-metal band Metallica against the rogue file-sharing service Napster as a compressed site for analysis in which we can analyse and unpack the music industry's present predicament, warped logic and the greed of its various protagonists. The paper is informed by a Marxist critique of public statements made by members of Metallica during what has come to be referred to as the 'Napster incident'. The band's departure from its previous existentialist and fraternal worldview in favour of a brutal form of Anglo-American market capitalism is exposed and we conclude that long-term extreme-metal fans are justified in their vilification of the band. The band is accountable to the scene and the scene has decided that Metallica has violated normative scene ethics or, in other words, the scene's internal social contract.

Suggested Citation

  • Kieran James & Christopher Tolliday, 2009. "Structural change in the music industry: a Marxist critique of public statements made by members of Metallica during the lawsuit against Napster," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1/2), pages 144-176.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:1:y:2009:i:1/2:p:144-176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=25335
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James, Kieran, 2010. "“Who am I? Where are we? Where do we go from here?” Marxism, voice, representation, and synthesis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(8), pages 696-710.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:1:y:2009:i:1/2:p:144-176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=328 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.