IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcrac/v14y2025i2p169-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contingent perspective on the auditor-client relationship: a new determinant of audit quality

Author

Listed:
  • Niels van Nieuw Amerongen
  • Patrick Nieuwenhuizen

Abstract

Agency theory, which emphasises the importance of auditor independence, has dominated auditing research for many decades. Under this theory, the dyadic contractual relationship between auditor and client is perceived as undesirable because it is seen as biasing the auditor towards their clients. We call for a re-evaluation of the impact on audit quality of the auditor-client relationship, based on important insights from sociology, in particular drawing on the literature on social exchange theory. We suggest that, while agency theory remains applicable in the domain of public interest entities (and other settings that include separation of management and ownership), social exchange theory is more closely applicable to small and medium-sized entities (in non-PIE settings) that value a relational approach over a transactional approach. Therefore, we argue that a contingent perspective should be applied. Subsequently, the contribution of a high-quality auditor-client relationship towards audit quality requires audit firms and individual auditors to implement both individual and organisational controls to maintain objectivity. Our analysis suggests that the benefits for audit quality of a good auditor-client relationship may have been underrated by auditors as well as audit clients.

Suggested Citation

  • Niels van Nieuw Amerongen & Patrick Nieuwenhuizen, 2025. "Contingent perspective on the auditor-client relationship: a new determinant of audit quality," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(2), pages 169-186.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:169-186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=144629
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:169-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=328 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.