IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcrac/v10y2018i2p152-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protecting the questionably knowledgeable user of accounting information: a defence of paternalism in the accounting profession

Author

Listed:
  • Babonyire Adafula
  • Williams Abayaawien Atuilik
  • John Kwaku Amoh

Abstract

The accounting profession has drawn and continues to draw criticisms from the downsides of paternalism based on libertarian economic views and the false assumption of the ability of people to make rational choices that are in their best interest. The modest goal of this paper is to call for a rethink in views on the paternalistic characterisation of the accounting profession. We argue that the accounting professional possesses specialised skill, expertise, and training for which he/she is hired by the client. Second, we assert that a prerequisite for understanding and use of accounting information is 'reasonable knowledge of business and commerce'. The justifications for the paternalistic orientation of the accounting profession are overwhelmingly persuasive. The paper therefore asserts that the proto-paternalistic posture of the accounting profession is an ineluctable phenomenon. Contemporary demands for reporting complex transactions and the incessant calls for stringent oversight of accounting practice make paternalism compelling.

Suggested Citation

  • Babonyire Adafula & Williams Abayaawien Atuilik & John Kwaku Amoh, 2018. "Protecting the questionably knowledgeable user of accounting information: a defence of paternalism in the accounting profession," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 152-168.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:152-168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=92331
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:152-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=328 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.