IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcist/v9y2013i1-2p74-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aware online interdependency modelling via evidence theory

Author

Listed:
  • Giusj Digioia
  • Chiara Foglietta
  • Gabriele Oliva
  • Stefano Panzieri

Abstract

Critical infrastructure interdependency models are typically used in a simulation-based perspective, in order to perform 'what if?' analyses and identify structural vulnerabilities in a dynamic perspective. While in the literature some attempts have been made to use interdependency models at real time, such approaches are flawed by the inability to properly determine the ongoing situation. Such models, typically, receive data from SCADA systems, which are mostly able to assess the effects of failures rather than the causes, while knowing the typology of failure would increase dramatically the predictive-ability of online interdependency models. In this paper, a situation awareness framework is provided with the aim to complement online interdependency models by providing more specific information on the causes of the outages highlighted by sensor data. In order to determine such causes, in this paper a transferable belief model representation is adopted to increase the awareness of interdependency models on fault causes. Moreover in this paper some of the limitations of evidence theory methods are highlighted and discussed, with particular reference to a real time context, providing some insights on how to overcome them, especially the closed-world assumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Giusj Digioia & Chiara Foglietta & Gabriele Oliva & Stefano Panzieri, 2013. "Aware online interdependency modelling via evidence theory," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1/2), pages 74-92.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:9:y:2013:i:1/2:p:74-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=51604
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:9:y:2013:i:1/2:p:74-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=58 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.