IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcist/v8y2012i4p326-335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An insight into bearing strength reporting methods of a runway pavement

Author

Listed:
  • Devinder K. Yadav
  • Hamid Nikraz

Abstract

All runways used by civil aircraft are classified according to their strength and they are given a load classification number (LCN) or single wheel loading (SWL) of its weakest point. Currently, the load bearing strength of a runway is reported using empirical approaches recommended by the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO). The ICAO has adopted a pavement classification system for reporting airfield strength known as aircraft classification number (ACN) and pavement classification number (PCN). This system reports a unique PCN, which indicates that an aircraft with an ACN equal to or less than the PCN can operate on the runway. ACN/PCN method enables evaluation of interaction between the aircraft landing gear and the runway pavement without a reference to the pavement thickness and it does not take potential runway deflection into account for this reporting. This paper presents an argument to include analytically calculated potential deflection for runway bearing strength reporting. It may be considered as a step towards rationalising the ACN-PCN system. The study reviews and analyses the suitability of the international practice of LCN reporting system. In conclusion, it is suggested that the bearing strength of a runway pavement should be reported using analytically calculated potential deflection.

Suggested Citation

  • Devinder K. Yadav & Hamid Nikraz, 2012. "An insight into bearing strength reporting methods of a runway pavement," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 326-335.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:8:y:2012:i:4:p:326-335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=50107
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:8:y:2012:i:4:p:326-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=58 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.