IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcist/v2y2006i2-3p146-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research agenda for an integrated approach to infrastructure planning, design and management

Author

Listed:
  • R. John Hansman
  • Christopher Magee
  • Richard De Neufville
  • Renee Robins
  • Daniel Roos

Abstract

Building on broad discussions between many universities, this paper presents a research agenda based on a holistic, comprehensive view of the issues. It proposes that our infrastructure is a system of systems involving different technical manifestations and social organisations. The implication is that we need a fundamental reconsideration of how we look at system design, away from traditional disciplinary considerations and toward a multi-domain, multi-disciplinary effort. To this end, it proposes an agenda of: comparative analyses across infrastructures and political structures, that would identify commonalities and larger lessons; creation of integrated socio-technical models that usefully describe the interactions between the technical infrastructure and its social context; methodological efforts, aimed largely at capturing the network characteristics, both technical and social, of the infrastructure system of systems; explicit testing and evaluation of the research through programs of collaboration with practitioners and governmental organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • R. John Hansman & Christopher Magee & Richard De Neufville & Renee Robins & Daniel Roos, 2006. "Research agenda for an integrated approach to infrastructure planning, design and management," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2/3), pages 146-159.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:2:y:2006:i:2/3:p:146-159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=9434
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul T. Grogan & Sebastiaan A. Meijer, 2017. "Gaming Methods in Engineering Systems Research," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(6), pages 542-552, November.
    2. Wang, Shih-Hsu, 2016. "An analytical model for benchmarking the development of national infrastructure items against those in similar countries," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 3-18.
    3. Giordano, Thierry, 2012. "Adaptive planning for climate resilient long-lived infrastructures," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 80-89.
    4. Jan H Kwakkel & Warren E Walker & Vincent A W J Marchau, 2012. "Assessing the Efficacy of Dynamic Adaptive Planning of Infrastructure: Results from Computational Experiments," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 39(3), pages 533-550, June.
    5. Sophie Schramm & Nguyen Thi Thanh Mai, 2019. "Turning waste into resources and resources into waste: Centralised waste-to-energy nexuses and alternative modes of nexusing in Hanoi," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(11), pages 2315-2332, August.
    6. Hugh Goldsmith, 2014. "The Long-Run Evolution of Infrastructure Services," CESifo Working Paper Series 5073, CESifo.
    7. Heeres, Niels & Tillema, Taede & Arts, Jos, 2012. "Integration in Dutch planning of motorways: From “line” towards “area-oriented” approaches," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 148-158.
    8. Gil, Nuno & Miozzo, Marcela & Massini, Silvia, 2012. "The innovation potential of new infrastructure development: An empirical study of Heathrow airport's T5 project," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 452-466.
    9. Jochen Monstadt & Olivier Coutard, 2019. "Cities in an era of interfacing infrastructures: Politics and spatialities of the urban nexus," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(11), pages 2191-2206, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:2:y:2006:i:2/3:p:146-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=58 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.