IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbsre/v19y2025i2p111-139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantum computing and risk prediction accuracy: an analysis of IT companies' risk appetite

Author

Listed:
  • A. Sivan
  • K. Priya

Abstract

This study analyses how quantum computing QAE improves IT risk appetite prediction. The study contains quantitative surveys of 256 IT specialists and qualitative interviews with ten industry professionals. The paper explores how QAE influences market volatility, infrastructure compatibility, data privacy and security, historical data availability, and risk appetite forecast accuracy. SEM and CFA testing show construct validity and model fitness, showing habit theory can predict outcomes (CFI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.05, SRMR = 0.03). The R-square value for this regression study is slightly above 72.7%, with accuracy, accessibility, and data privacy/security being the primary factors influencing risk appetite forecasts (β = 0.235, p < 0.001). All components are positively correlated at 0.7210.765, while QAE moderates risk appetite by 0.38. Discriminant validity evaluates construct differences and assures reasonable links. The study found that quantum computing can alter IT risk management and uncover application and data handling issues. This study shows how to create quantum-enhanced risk models and assess IT industry quantum computing preparedness. Cross-sectional data, simulation-based analysis, future research, a longitudinal study, and quantum-resistant encryption risk management are briefly explored as study flaws. We improve quantum finance literature and help IT firms manage quantum risk.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Sivan & K. Priya, 2025. "Quantum computing and risk prediction accuracy: an analysis of IT companies' risk appetite," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(2), pages 111-139.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:19:y:2025:i:2:p:111-139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=145483
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:19:y:2025:i:2:p:111-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=206 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.