IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v9y2007i3p278-286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of indigenous and non-indigenous enterprise in the Canadian sub-Arctic

Author

Listed:
  • Leo-Paul Dana

Abstract

Entrepreneurship has conventionally been thought of as a function of opportunity. The problem with such an ethnocentric approach, however, is that it assumes a uniform response to opportunity across cultures. In contrast, this article makes use of ethnographic means in a cross-cultural setting to illustrate that aboriginal and non-aboriginal persons in Churchill expressed fundamentally different concepts of self-employment. The study took place in the Canadian sub-Arctic town of Churchill, in Northern Manitoba, over a period of two years. Rather than base himself on a random sample, the researcher immersed himself in the field and contacted each entrepreneur in town. Findings suggest that the causal variable behind enterprise is not an opportunity, but rather one's cultural perception of opportunity.

Suggested Citation

  • Leo-Paul Dana, 2007. "A comparison of indigenous and non-indigenous enterprise in the Canadian sub-Arctic," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 278-286.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:9:y:2007:i:3:p:278-286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=13308
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:9:y:2007:i:3:p:278-286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.