IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v2y2000i1-2-3p194-209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate performance: the paradox of UK Plcs' management perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • D. Michael Brown

Abstract

Grouping of Blue Chip companies has become a popular pastime. But bringing together Kwik Save, Tarmac, Ladbrokes and National Grid as a group of superior performing companies perhaps stretches the imagination a little. To suggest further that Cadbury, Tesco, BP and Reuters are myopic might challenge preconceptions. This however is the finding of information gathered from Britain's top senior executives. The article highlights the self-perceptions by senior executives of their company's performance and compares this with the perceptions of other senior executives and expert analysts. The results highlight the contrariness that exists between the UK's senior managers and suggests that this is a further reason for the UK's failure to close the international competitiveness gap.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Michael Brown, 2000. "Corporate performance: the paradox of UK Plcs' management perceptions," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1/2/3), pages 194-209.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:2:y:2000:i:1/2/3:p:194-209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=68
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Jones & Malcolm J Beynon & David Pickernell & Gary Packham, 2013. "Evaluating the Impact of Different Training Methods on SME Business Performance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(1), pages 56-81, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:2:y:2000:i:1/2/3:p:194-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.