IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v19y2018i3p326-348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The moderating role of environmental management accounting between environmental innovation and firm financial performance

Author

Listed:
  • Sayedeh Parastoo Saeidi
  • Mohd Shahwahid Haji Othman
  • Parvaneh Saeidi
  • Sayyedeh Parisa Saeidi

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationships among innovation, environmental management accounting (EMA), and firm's financial performance. Specifically, this study explores the relationships of both product and process innovations with financial performance. Furthermore, this study examines the moderating role of EMA on the above relationships. Data were collected in a survey of top managers of the SMEs in manufacturing and consumer product industries in Iran, using a questionnaire. Hierarchical regression analysis was used to test all hypotheses. The findings revealed that both product and process innovations have positive relationships with firms' financial performance, while this effect is significant about product innovation and not significant about process innovation. Moreover, contrary to expectations, this study found a negative moderating effect of EMA on the relationship between process innovation and financial performance. However, no moderating effect of EMA was found on product innovation and financial performance relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Sayedeh Parastoo Saeidi & Mohd Shahwahid Haji Othman & Parvaneh Saeidi & Sayyedeh Parisa Saeidi, 2018. "The moderating role of environmental management accounting between environmental innovation and firm financial performance," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(3), pages 326-348.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:19:y:2018:i:3:p:326-348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=92759
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Musaab Alnaim & Abdelmoneim Bahyeldin Mohamed Metwally, 2024. "Institutional Pressures and Environmental Management Accounting Adoption: Do Environmental Strategy Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Wei Xuecheng & Qaisar Iqbal, 2022. "Ethical Leadership, Bricolage, and Eco-Innovation in the Chinese Manufacturing Industry: A Multi-Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Abdalwali Lutfi & Hamza Alqudah & Mahmaod Alrawad & Ahmad Farhan Alshira’h & Malek Hamed Alshirah & Mohammed Amin Almaiah & Adi Alsyouf & Mohammed Faisal Hassan, 2023. "Green Environmental Management System to Support Environmental Performance: What Factors Influence SMEs to Adopt Green Innovations?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Mutasim Asa’d & Wan Norhayati Wan Ahmad & Hazeline Ayoup, 2024. "Environmental Management Accounting Information and Environmental Performance, the Mediating Effect of Environmental Decision Quality," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(2), pages 562-573, March.
    5. Shanyong Wang & Hualong Wang & Jing Wang, 2019. "Exploring the effects of institutional pressures on the implementation of environmental management accounting: Do top management support and perceived benefit work?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 233-243, January.
    6. Jenkins A. Asaah & Beatrice L. Asaah & Austin W. Luguterah, 2020. "Diagnosing the Organizational Culture of Rural Community Banks in Ghana and Its Effects on Their Financial Performance," Journal of Social Science Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(2), pages 86-114, December.
    7. Badar Latif & Zeeshan Mahmood & Ong Tze San & Ridzwana Mohd Said & Allah Bakhsh, 2020. "Coercive, Normative and Mimetic Pressures as Drivers of Environmental Management Accounting Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Ndubisi, Nelson Oly & Roman Pais Seles, Bruno Michel, 2020. "Sustainable development in Asian manufacturing SMEs: Progress and directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    9. Yusheng Kong & Fahad Javed & Jahanzaib Sultan & Muhammad Shehzad Hanif & Noheed Khan, 2022. "EMA Implementation and Corporate Environmental Firm Performance: A Comparison of Institutional Pressures and Environmental Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:19:y:2018:i:3:p:326-348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.