IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v11y2009i4p364-382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving business performance in multi-company projects through 'cooperative power': presentation of a collaborative tool model

Author

Listed:
  • Wenche Aarseth
  • Hans Christian Sorhaug

Abstract

Increasing global competition drives most industries to search for competitive advantages and continuous process improvement. Through a three-year research project we found that the competitive advantage of multi-company projects lies in the ability to make a shift from the competitiveness and performance of the autonomous firm to the competitiveness and performance of the value chain of firms. Nearly all important indicators and measurements of profit and efficiency were linked to the performance of the firm and the traditional business worldview strongly emphasises competitive power. There is little mention of the flip side of the coin, which is cooperative power. The purpose of this paper is to improve business performance in projects by understanding the concept 'cooperative power' and what conditions influence projects organisational problems. As we found no literature on how to practically implement cooperative power, we developed a practical model which companies can use in projects in the future to improve performance. The empirical results are based on an extensive literature study, interviews, project presentations and focus group work in 14 companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenche Aarseth & Hans Christian Sorhaug, 2009. "Improving business performance in multi-company projects through 'cooperative power': presentation of a collaborative tool model," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(4), pages 364-382.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:11:y:2009:i:4:p:364-382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=30955
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Knut R Fossum & Brit-Eli Danielsen & Wenche Aarseth & Stig Ole Johnsen, 2018. "A project management issue of new technology developments: A case study on lack of human factors’ attention in human–robot interaction," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(2), pages 164-173, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:11:y:2009:i:4:p:364-382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.